Close
Privacy settings
We use cookies and similar technologies that are necessary to run the website. Additional cookies are only used with your consent. You can consent to our use of cookies by clicking on Agree. For more information on which data is collected and how it is shared with our partners please read our privacy and cookie policy: Cookie policy, Privacy policy
We use cookies to access, analyse and store information such as the characteristics of your device as well as certain personal data (IP addresses, navigation usage, geolocation data or unique identifiers). The processing of your data serves various purposes: Analytics cookies allow us to analyse our performance to offer you a better online experience and evaluate the efficiency of our campaigns. Personalisation cookies give you access to a customised experience of our website with usage-based offers and support. Finally, Advertising cookies are placed by third-party companies processing your data to create audiences lists to deliver targeted ads on social media and the internet. You may freely give, refuse or withdraw your consent at any time using the link provided at the bottom of each page.
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.
/
/
DevSecOps

Containers vs Virtual Machines

VMs and container technology are examples of virtualization, which permits you to make better use of your computer's hardware and software. Although while executable units have been around for a while, their widespread acceptance over the past few years has significantly altered the way IT is typically done. Nonetheless, VMs have been widely adopted in data hubs of all sizes for some time now.

You need to be familiar with various artificial intelligence technologies as you consider architectural options, such as whether or not to operate facilities and apps in the cloud. Today, we'll examine these tools' features, how they stack up against one another, and how you might employ them to speed up your organization's digital transition.

Containers vs Virtual Machines

Container Overview

They are small software bundles that include everything needed to run the source code inside them. System libraries, external third-party code packages, and other frameworks at the operating system level are examples of these dependencies. The gears that a container relies on are located on higher stack layers than the OS itself.

  1. Purpose

They were developed so that software may be packaged and executed in a consistent manner regardless of the platform. Instead of recreating the situation, you packaged the application so that it could run in any real or virtual setting. Comparable to simply having an astronaut wear a spacesuit while exploring a new planet rather than attempting to recreate Earth's atmosphere there.

  1. Pros 
  • Iteration rate

Due to their small footprint and focus on high-level applications, standalone executable packages are easy to update and refine rapidly.

  • Consistent ecosystem

Prefabricated software packages can be found in the local storage offered by most container runtime systems. Several widely used programs, such as databases and messaging systems, are readily available in these depositories and can be downloaded, installed, and used in a matter of seconds, saving valuable time for developers.

  1. Con
  • Host-based exposures

Since the underlying hardware system is shared by all packaging regardless of their OS, a vulnerability in a contained environment could compromise the entire system. The most popular code package runtimes have public directories where you can find container libraries that have already been built.

Think twice before using any of these freely available images because they may contain exploits or be hacked.

Popular tools

It dominates runtimes. It hosts prevalent containerized freeware and can be downloaded and operated locally in seconds.

  • RKT

It is a secure system. Its code package only permits insecure functionality if the user actively permits it. It handles cross contamination exploitive security problems that other container runtime systems have.

  • Linux Containers (LXC)

It is an open-source software package runtime and separates system-level methods. It powers Docker and it is also a vendor-neutral open-source container runtime.

  • CRI-O

It implements the Kubernetes Container Runtime Interface (CRI) for OCI-compatible runtimes. It's lighter than Docker for Kubernetes.

Container Virtual Machine

VMs are robust software suites that faithfully simulate low-level hardware components including CPU, disc, and net components. Complementary software stacks designed to work with the hardware being imitated may also be included in it. When all of this software and hardware is put together, a complete snapshot of a computer system is created.

  1. Purpose

Technology for creating virtual machines first arose out of a need to make better use of ever-more-powerful actual hardware. The physical components were inadequate since just one application environment was being run on the host. It is now possible for businesses to run several operating systems and test various scenarios on a single server by using VMs.

  1. Pros 
  • Discreet, secure isolation

It functions independently from other computers. This means that VMs on a shared host can't be exploited or hampered in any way. An exploit can still take over a single VM, but the compromised VM will be quarantined and cannot spread malware to its fellow VMs.

  • Synergistic growth

When it comes to dependencies and settings, containers are typically defined statically. Computer simulations are more adaptable and open to iterative refinement. It is effectively a bare-bones computer once its fundamental hardware description has been provided. 

The VM can have software put on it manually, and snapshots can be taken to preserve the configuration at a particular point in time. Snapshots of a VM can be used to roll back the machine to an earlier state or to quickly create a new machine with the exact same settings.

  1. Cons
  • Frequency of iterations

Due to the fact that they include the entire stack, VMs are labor-intensive to create and recreate. The time required to regenerate and validate the behavior of a virtual machine snapshot after it has been modified can be substantial.

  • Size costs

The storage needs of virtual machines might be substantial. Quickly reaching many gigabytes in size. This may cause problems with the host machine's disc space when running multiple virtual machines.

Popular tools

  • Virtualbox

Developed and maintained by Oracle, it is a free and open-source x86 architectural emulation system. It is one of the most well-known and widely-used VM platforms, and it's supported by a wide range of third-party applications for creating and sharing VM images.

  • VMware

Founded on pioneering work in x86 hardware virtualization, it is a publicly traded firm. A hypervisor, or utility to deploy and manage numerous VMs, is built into VMware. Its user interface is quite functional, making it easy to control VM. It is a wonderful virtualization platform for businesses because it provides assistance.

  • QEMU

When it comes to hardware emulation, it is your best VM bet. Every arbitrary hardware architecture is fully supported. It can only be used through the command line; there is no graphical user interface for configuring or running the program. With this compromise, it is one of the fastest available VM alternatives.

Containers vs. VMs

What Are the Similarities?

They both provide complete application isolation, enabling deployment across a variety of platforms. They shield end users from having to deal with the underlying infrastructure by virtualizing or abstracting it. 

Moreover, you can create an "image file" that contains your entire software infrastructure. Use the image file to instantly deploy and operate your program on any device, with no effort. Software processes can also be scaled to manage thousands of apps simultaneously and can be used to manage system setups. 

However, containers and VMs play different roles and are used to varying degrees depending on the environment in which the app is deployed.

Containers vs. VMs: What are the differences?

Containers emulate a system so software may be deployed to and run on any computer without needing to download the broadcaster OS first. But VMs go farther by simulating actual hardware, allowing for more effective use of scarce hardware resources. Here, we list a few more container vs VM difference.

  1. Key Differences
  • How they function?

Container technology creates self-sufficient, machine-independent software packages. Container images—application-specific files—are created and deployed by software developers. Computers cannot change container pictures.

Virtual machine technology refers to the practice of installing virtualization software onto a real desktop or laptop computer. The network server binds up the guest VM. Adjust the settings of the guest OS and its applications independently of the server.

  • Basic tech

Datbase server connects guest and host OS in VMs. The hypervisor supervises resource sharing, so the a digitally simulated device runs alone on shared hardware.

Containers employ container engines or runtimes. This software provides and manages application-required system resources between containers and the operating system. Docker dominates open-source software package engines.

  • Capacity

Due to their operating system, virtual machine image files are many GB. Duplicate, partition, abstract, and imitate servers, databases, desktops, and networks with more resources. Executed package files weigh less in MB, and it only contains application resources.

  1. Using Containers Vs. Using Virtual Machines

When choosing between VMs and code packages for application deployment, consider these factors.

  • Setup

VMs lets developers control the application's environment. They can manually install system freeware, snapshot configuration states, and restore them. They help with brainstorming, experimentation, and application performance testing in multiple situations.

Containers define configurations statically after selecting the best ones.

  • Development speed

Full-stack virtual machines are difficult to design and renew. Regenerating the setting takes time to validate changes.

If you often build, test, and release new features, use containers. They are easy to change and repeat since they use high-level software.

  • Scalability

VMs require greater storage and hardware in on-premises data centers. Cloud instances cut expenses, but moving your entire infrastructure is difficult.

Containers are compact and scalable. Microservices provide microservice-based application scalability. Microservices are small independent services that communicate over well-defined APIs

Some of the shared and unique features of these supplementary technologies are laid forth in the table below.

Containers vs. VMs

FeatureVMContainer
SolitudeThis feature completely separates the VM from the host computer and any other VMs running on the host. This is helpful in situations where a tight security wall is required, such as when two or more firms run their programs on the same server or cluster.Offers minimal separation from the host and other containers, but not as much protection as a virtual machine. For further safety, you can run each container on its own tiny VM by switching to Hyper-isolation V's mode.
OSRuns the kernel and operating system, using higher system resources.Serves the user mode section of an OS and can be customized to contain only the services your app needs, saving system resources.
Guest-compatibilityVirtually runs any OS.Runs on the same OS version as the host.
DeploymentPowerShell or System Center VM Management may launch many or single VMs.Use Azure Kubernetes Service or Docker to deploy numerous containers.
OS upgradesUpdate each VM's OS. A new OS involves upgrading or building a new VM. If you have many VMs, this can be time-consuming.Container OS file updates are the same:
  • Point your Dockerfile to the newest Windows base image.
  • Rebuild your container image using this new base image.
  • Register the container image.
  • Now the orchestrator automates this at scale.
StorageUtilize a VHD for single-VM local storage or an SMB file sharing for multi-server storage.Azure Disks are local storage for a single node, while Azure Files are shared storage.
BalancingIn a failover cluster, VM load balancing moves running VMs.An orchestrator starts and stops containers on cluster nodes to manage load and availability.
Fault-tolerantVMs can fail over to another cluster server, restarting their operating systems.Whenever a cluster node fails, the orchestrator quickly recreates its containers on another cluster node.
NetworkingVirtual network adapters are used.Uses an isolated view of a virtual network adapter and shares the host's firewall with containers.

FAQ

Open
Can containers and virtual machines be used together?
Open
What are some use cases for containers vs virtual machines?
Open
What are the security implications of using containers vs virtual machines?
Open
How do containers and virtual machines differ in terms of performance?
Open
What is the difference between containers and virtual machines?

References

Subscribe for the latest news

Updated:
April 14, 2024
Learning Objectives
Subscribe for
the latest news
subscribe
Related Topics