Introduction
API2:Broken User Authentication
| Threat agents/Attack vectors | Security Weakness | Impacts |
|---|---|---|
| It's not easy to implement authentication correctly. A lot of developers and architects get confused by what to include in the authentication control because software these days often is made up of complex multi-layered systems. Usually authentication mechanisms are also an often targeted system due to it being publicly available. | One of the issues that can arise is that we implement the authentication control incorrectly. API endpoints that handle authentication need to be designed differently from other endpoints and this is often overlooked. Another issue that might arise is that the authentication is implemented incorrectly. For example we might have an endpoint for mobile app authentication that is being used for web application authentication as well. | This vulnerability can easily lead to an attacker taking over the complete account of the victim. They can then impersonate the victim and steal their private data that is saved on the site. |
Broken User Authentication can manifest in several issues. Whenever we come across an API endpoint that handles authentication we need to be extra careful since these endpoints will often determine how a user can flow through the application and what data they see. Whenever one of the following conditions is true, we can speak of a "Broken User Authentication

password recovery
The attacker might start the workflow to reset a password by triggering the /api/v1/reset-password endpoint.
POST /api/v1/reset-password
{
userID=123
}This will trigger a password reset for user "rat" and the user will receive a password reset token in their mailbox which is a 4 digit number. Since there is no rate limiting on the endpoint, the attacker can try to send all 4 digit numbers in rapid succession and simply brute force it.
POST /api/v1/reset-password-token
{
userID=123.
tokenID=xxxx
newPass=test
}the attacker can then guess the token and reset the password for the user.
JWT validation endpoint accepts "None" algorithm
A JWT endpoint should always validate the token with the proper algorithm, most JWT frameworks have the None algorithm enabled by default and this very bad, to know why we shoud have a look at how JWT for work first.
A JWT token is Json Web Token. They are tokens containing information about users for example and the beauty is that we can always easily decode these and view the information. If we want to change anything though we have to sign it with an algorithm.
This is an example of a JWT token, when we decode it we get the following:
{
"alg": "HS256",
"typ": "JWT"
}
{
"userID": "123",
"sub": "1234567890",
"name": "John Doe",
"iat": 1516239022
}If we want to edit this JWT token we will have to know the HS256 key.
Now that you know how JWT's work, you can see why it's bad if the verification mechanisms accepts the None algorithm. We can simply change something in the JWT and encode it again when we change the algorithm to None.
{
"alg": "None",
"typ": "JWT"
}
{
"userID": "567",
"sub": "1234567890",
"name": "John Doe",
"iat": 1516239022
}eyJhbGciOiJIUzI1NiIsInR5cCI6IkpXVCJ9.eyJpZCI6IjU2NyIsInN1YiI6IjEyMzQ1Njc4OTAiLCJuYW1lIjoiSm9obiBEb2UiLCJpYXQiOjE1MTYyMzkwMjJ9.NhHRUCQw5Wtuc7Jn2ImmC8URY0UmcuEkukmNA9FrccsIf we now replace this token in our headers when we make a request, we should see an error because our token should not be valid, however if the server is still configured to accept requests signed with the None algorithm, they will be vulnerable to Broken User Authentication.

When dealing with authentication endpoints we need to implement much stricted security mechanisms than when dealing with normal endpoints. We need to make sure we have good rate limiting, lockout and captcha mechanisms to prevent attackers from brute forcing or credential stuffing our API's. Make sure you implement safe authentication mechanisms and if you are unsure you can always refer to the OWASP Authentication Cheatsheet, also read the OWASP Top 10 vulnerabilities article or use the services of Wallarm - API security platform
An API2 Broken User Authentication vulnerability is a security flaw that allows attackers to gain unauthorized access to user accounts by exploiting flaws in the authentication process.
Some common examples of API2 Broken User Authentication vulnerabilities include weak passwords, vulnerable login pages, session hijacking, and insufficient encryption.
To prevent API2 Broken User Authentication vulnerabilities, it is recommended to implement multi-factor authentication, password policies, and session management controls. It is also important to regularly update and patch any software or tools used in the authentication process.
API2 Broken User Authentication vulnerabilities can lead to unauthorized access to sensitive information, system breaches, and data loss. This can result in financial loss, legal liabilities, and reputational damage for companies and organizations.
OWASP lists broken authentication and session management as one of the top ten web application security risks. They provide guidance and resources for developers to prevent API2 Broken User Authentication vulnerabilities in their applications.
Subscribe for the latest news