ARP Spoofing or ARP Poisoning

Analyzing ARP's Functional Methodology

For achieving successful data packet transportation within a confined LAN, a device transmitting data needs to ascertain the physical identifier of the intended recipient device. This identifier is formally recognized as the Media Access Control (MAC) address. Typically a transmitting device only possesses the recipient's Internet Protocol (IP) address. The gap between the two identifiers is bridged by ARP.

Through its innovative convention, ARP allows the data-transmitting device to project a broadcast plea throughout the network. This plea can be equated to an inquiry - "Which device corresponds to this particular IP address?". The device which is assigned the stated IP address reciprocates by revealing its unique MAC identifier. This exchange enables the transmitter to establish effective communication.

Recognizing the Flaw in ARP's Design

The Achilles heel of the ARP mechanism can be traced back to its inherent trust in the network devices. It operates under the assumption that all network devices will provide an accurate response. The failure in authenticating these responses grants an opportunity for ill-intentioned entities to exploit the protocol and give rise to ARP Spoofing.

ARP Spoofing Explained

Frequently denoted as ARP Poisoning, the term refers to a deceptive tactic employed by cybersecurity lawbreakers to hijack data within a LAN. This tactic entails the transmission of fake ARP messages intended to mislead devices into associating the perpetrator’s MAC address with an authentic device's IP address on the network.

By adopting this masquerade, the offender persuasively mimics a trusted network device and intercepts data targeted towards it. This action lays the groundwork for multiple potential security breaches, such as unauthorized data alterations, unwarranted data access, or catalyzing further malware attacks within the network.

ARP Spoofing Strategies Examined

Two main strategies underline the concept of ARP Spoofing: Gratuitous ARP and ARP Cache Poisoning.

1. Gratuitous ARP: Here, the unethical hacker disseminates unrequested ARP replies, which are not preceded by any request, to network devices. This action tricks the devices into associating their MAC identifier with an apparently legitimate but in reality a deceptive IP address housed within the hack source. Due to the lack of any response authentication mechanism within ARP, devices are mislead into accepting the fraudulent information, causing data traffic to be rerouted to the offender.
2. ARP Cache Poisoning: Every device within the network harbors an ARP cache, a table that correlates IP addresses to their associated MAC identifiers. In an ARP Cache Poisoning scenario, the offender circulates misleading ARP replies to distort the cache with fabricated information. As an unexpected result, devices direct their data to erroneous MAC identifiers, allowing the offender to intercept and confiscate the data.

In the sections that follow, we will delve deeper into the nuances of ARP Spoofing, laying bare its operational mechanics, threats posed, and the potential measures of defense.

Transforming ARP functionality for Correlating MAC Addresses through IP Identification

Within the expansive realm of the Internet Protocol Suite exists an indispensable module known as the Address Resolution Protocol (ARP). ARP's primary duty is to serve as a translator, transmuting IP identifiers into equivalent MAC identifiers.

The seamless transfer of data packets across an extensive network relies heavily on the originating node's capability to decode the genuine physical identifier of the recipient node. Should the circumstances arise in which a MAC identifier is unavailable, but an IP identifier is, ARP steps in to address this gap. In response, ARP formulates a request and derives the associated MAC identifier linked to the IP ensuring uninterrupted network dialogue.

Unmasking ARP Spoofing: A Subtle Threat to Cybersecurity

ARP Spoofing, also referred to as ARP poisoning, is an insidious strategy rampant in the cybersecurity landscape. It consists of a malevolent discrepant sending fabricated ARP messages within a network. The intent is to deceive the network devices into accepting the discrepant's MAC identifier as legitimate, often feigning the roles of a network server or conduit.

The tactics employed in ARP Spoofing are as follows:

1. An adversarial entity uses ARP tampering software to associate their IP with the victim’s.
2. This software instigates the dispatch of falsified ARP responses devoid of any genuine requests.
3. Each counterfeit ARP response ostensibly emanates from an authentic network member, replacing the legitimate system's IP identifier with the adversarial entity's MAC identifier.
4. Network equipment treats these fraudulent ARP responses as accurate, leading them to update their ARP cache with erroneous information and rerouting subsequent network traffic directly to the adversarial entity's system.

The Damaging Aftermath of ARP Cache Contamination

Once an adversarial entity successfully pollutes the ARP cache, they gain a clear advantage. They receive all incoming information formerly meant for the preyed-upon device. This severe breach of security can leak sensitive personal details ranging from passwords to classified documents.

Moreover, the adversarial entity obtains the potential to edit the intercepted data before it reaches its rightful recipient. This has the potential for the release of false information and data loss. In extreme instances, this could lay the groundwork for catastrophic Man-In-The-Middle (MitM) attacks.

A Comprehensive Scrutiny of ARP Spoofing

Let's consider a real-time scenario involving three systems - System A (target), System B (offender), and System C (intermediary).

Under regular operations, System A would send out an ARP request to fetch the MAC address associated with System C's IP. Post the request, System C would relay its own MAC identifier to facilitate the data exchange process.

But, in an ARP Spoofing context, System B (the offender) transmits misleading ARP responses to System A, wrongly associating System C's IP with its own MAC identifier. System A incorporates this misguidance in its ARP cache. Consequently, all communication aimed at the intermediary (System C) is redirected to the rogue system (System B).

This detailed analysis of ARP Spoofing may appear straightforward. Nonetheless, the real-world application could involve a greater number of systems, significantly making the situation more convoluted.

ARP Spoofing: A Hacker's Trifecta of Simplicity, Effectiveness, and Versatility

The attraction cyber attackers find in ARP Spoofing resides primarily in three aspects: it is straightforward to execute, efficient in causing disruptions, and flexible enough to be used in various attacks.

In the realm of hacking, the attractiveness of ARP Spoofing starts at its bare-bones procedure. The protocol, INA (Internet Network Addresses), otherwise known as ARP, was engineered to coordinate IP addresses with corresponding MAC addresses within a network. Security precautions were overlooked in its design, prodding cyber attackers as an uncomplicated target.

Hacking endeavours involving ARP Spoofing typically include transmitting deceptive INA messages across an ethernet network. The cyber attacker can then establish correspondences with their MAC address and the IP address of an intact network component. Intricacies within advanced hacking techniques aren't a necessity here, facilitating even the inexperienced hackers in their sinister pursuits.

The practicality ARP Spoofing provides to hackers claim the second highlight for its prominence among cyberattack methodologies. Upon successful pairing with an authentic IP address, cyber attackers can manipulate, suppress, or intercept digital communication coming to or from the genuine appliance. This enables a range of harmful activities, like pilfering confidential data or initiating service denial attacks.

Eluding detection adds a cherry on top of this digital exploit's enticing effectiveness. Established network protection measures such as firewalls and anomalies detection systems regularly fall short in identifying ARP Spoofing, since the breach happens within a deemed secure network.

No hacker would refuse a tool designed with utility, and therein lies the third allure for ARP Spoofing: its multipurpose nature. Be it a primary attack to seize valuable data or an approach to wreak havoc within the network operations, this method delivers.

Moreover, if a cyber attacker desires a more intricate, high-stake strategy, ARP Spoofing stands as an efficient precursor. For example, upon gaining access using ARP Spoofing, attackers could instigate communication interception and alteration tactics, popularly known as man-in-the-middle attacks, unbeknown to the involved parties. The method paves the way for advanced attacks such as session hijack, IP falsification, and DNS adulteration as well.

Thus, the effortless application, impactful results, and adaptable nature of ARP Spoofing render it an asset for hackers, a peril for data safety, and a robust indication for bolstering network security.

Confidentiality Compromised

ARP Spoofing poses a significant security dilemma, primarily as it facilitates unauthorized access to private data. The intruder, after a successful ARP Spoofing exploit, can scan, decipher, and even manipulate the transmitted information among devices. Such an invasion can disclose confidential elements like passwords, economic particulars, and identity-related information.

Network Services Obstruction

The aftermath of ARP Spoofing also involves the potential interruption of network functionalities. By drowning the network in counterfeit ARP messages, an infiltrator might overwhelm the system, triggering considerable lags or even absolute standstills. This scenario can spell extensive inefficiencies and productivity decline, predominantly in commercial settings where network availability is indispensable.

Gateway to Man-in-the-Middle Offensives

ARP Spoofing can function as the springboard for more intricate offensives such as Man-in-the-Middle (MitM) onslaughts. In a MitM offensive, the intruder fortifies their position between two interacting entities, intercepting and possibly distorting the dialogue, unbeknownst to both parties. This occurrence can catalyze additional data exposures and acute network disturbances.

Illicit Access and Dominance

Occasionally, ARP Spoofing might allow the infiltrator illegitimate entry to network resources and even dominance over the network apparatus. This situation could propagate a spectrum of plausible damages, ranging from data pilferage and alterations to the deployment of harmful software.

Monetary and Credibility Implications

The residues of ARP Spoofing can lead to substantial monetary and credibility implications. Enterprises may confront direct monetary losses from theft or fraud, complemented by indirect expenses related to network unavailability, data restoration, and system rectifications. Furthermore, a security breach of this magnitude can profoundly impair an organization's standing, resulting in diminishing customer confidence and possible legal ramifications.

Network Speed Deceleration

A sudden and unexplained slowdown in your digital infrastructure could be a red flag signaling an ARP spoof attack. This occurs when a hacker floods your framework with misleading ARP responses, causing a drastic increase in data transmission. An unaccounted slowdown of your infrastructure could be an indication of a potential ARP spoof invasion.

IP-MAC Alterations

In an ARP spoof scenario, attackers commonly modify the IP-MAC (Media Access Control) correlation in the ARP database. This alteration can be identified by consistently analyzing the ARP database for unanticipated changes. A surprising modification in the current IP-MAC pair can hint at an ongoing ARP spoof invasion.

Amplification in ARP Broadcasts

In an attempt to carry out an ARP Spoof attack, culprits often launch a storm of ARP broadcasts. By closely observing data transmission and recording a sudden escalation in ARP broadcasts, this mode of attack can be ascertained. An unforeseen surge in these broadcasts may indicate an attempted ARP spoof invasion.

Unusual ARP Responses

Keep an eye on your digital infrastructure for unstable ARP responses, which might suggest an ARP spoof invasion. Inconsistencies can be discovered by tracking the ARP responses within your framework. An ARP response from a previously unrequested IP address may indicate an ongoing ARP spoof invasion.

Out of Ordinary Network Activities

Beyond the aforementioned indications, any abnormal network activity could potentially be a warning sign of an ARP spoof invasion. This may include unanticipated system resets, unaccounted data usage, or unusual error notifications. Identifying such irregularities requires immediate attention as they might be linked to an attempted ARP spoof invasion.

In the table, we draw a comparison between standard network functioning and possible symptoms of an ARP spoofing attack:

Regular observation of these critical areas as a part of network management protocol can assist in the early detection and effective handling of ARP spoofing invasions.

Network Set-Up Measures

Protecting your network against Address Resolution Protocol (ARP) spoofing starts with a proper network set-up. Several strategies that help with this comprise:

1. Unchanging ARP: An unchanging ARP approach entails setting up the ARP table manually to remain unchanged. Implementing this method can limit ARP spoofing incidents. Still, it requires considerable work, particularly for wider networks.
2. Restricted Virtual Local Area Networks (VLANs): Through restricted VLANs, the communication between each network host is hampered, preventing potential attacks via spoofed ARP responses.
3. Active ARP Scrutiny (AAS): Many switches include an AAS feature which examines network ARP packages, disposing of mismatching IP-MAC pairs.

Protective Digital Tools

Another way to safeguard your network from ARP spoofing is through specific digital tools. They include:

1. Network Anomaly Detection Systems (NADS): NADS aid in identifying unusual network activity, such as excessive ARP responses. In such events, they notify the person in charge of network management, or, if necessary, restrict the peculiar traffic.
2. ARP Deception Deterrent Software: Unique software built to deter ARP spoofing is available in the market. They scan the network for unusual ARP behavior and have the ability to block or raise alarms in response to possible ARP spoofing attempts.
3. Traffic Filter: Using a well-set traffic filter, like a firewall, enhances protection against ARP spoofing. It can obstruct unfamiliar MAC addresses or unauthorized IP addresses' traffic.

Progressively Informing Users

The success of technical precautionary measures also hinges on informed users. They need to grasp the following aspects:

1. ARP Spoofing Insight: Users must comprehend the concept of ARP spoofing, its implications, potential risks, such as unauthorized access to sensitive information, or network pulses.
2. Recognizing Deceptive Activity: Users ought to be trained on how to detect ARP spoofing attacks. That could entail observing unexpected slowing down of the network, inexplicable data usage spikes, or warnings from installed protective software.
3. Secure Behavior: Promoting secure conduct, like caution when engaging with dubious links, avoiding installing unverified software, and keeping their devices updated with recent security enhancements, is imperative.

By implementing these provisions, it's possible to drastically diminish the likelihood of ARP spoofing attacks. However, perfection isn't achievable, hence constant awareness and readiness serve as crucial elements within network security protocols.

Implementing Unalterable ARP Entries

ARP Spoofing can be substantially reduced through the introduction of unalterable ARP entries. This method demands a hands-on approach of feeding the respective IP and their partnered MAC addresses manually into the ARP log. This strategy works efficiently in smaller network systems with static IP and MAC addresses. However, its effectiveness may diminish in vast networks due to the amount of manual input needed.

To add these static ARP records for Windows, you can use the following command:

netsh interface ip add neighbors "Network Interface Name" "IP Address" "MAC Address"

For Linux, you can apply the below command:

Using Tools for Monitoring ARP Spoofing

There are several dedicated tools designed specifically to detect and alert about potential ARP Spoofing instances. These software utilities actively scan the network, looking for any suspicious ARP data packets, and signal an alarm to the network administrator when any irregularities are found. Tools like Arpwatch, XArp, and ARP-GUARD fit this description.

Arpwatch is a Unix-oriented tool for monitoring Ethernet traffic and keeps track of Ethernet/IP mappings. It alerts the network administrators through email about any detected anomalies.

XArp stands out with its proactive approach to handle ARP based threats and can be used on both Windows and Linux platforms.

ARP-GUARD, a robust anti-ARP Spoofing solution, is designed to cover large networks by implementing features like automatic blocking of probable threats.

Utilizing Dynamic ARP Inspection (DAI)

A popular security feature in many modern switches, Dynamic ARP Inspection (DAI), plays a critical role in halting ARP Spoofing. It functions by verifying ARP packets and confirming their authenticity before forwarding them. DAI is capable of rejecting ARP packets that exhibits mismatched IP-to-MAC address links, thus mitigating ARP Spoofing.

To activate DAI on a Cisco switch, use these commands:

 
Switch(config)# ip arp inspection vlan number
Switch(config)# ip arp inspection validate src-mac dst-mac ip

Making Use of Virtual Private Networks (VPNs)

VPNs can be handy allies in the fight against ARP Spoofing. Their data encryption properties make it exceptionally difficult for potential intruders to seize and alter the data. While VPNs may not block ARP spoofing outright, they diminish its impact by ensuring that any intercepted data remains incomprehensible.

Maintaining Up-to-date Systems and Software Patches

Frequent system updates and patching of software is a crucial step in fortifying network security. By doing so, systems are provided with the latest security features and become more resilient to known vulnerabilities that could be used as an attack vector in ARP Spoofing.

Specific Strategies to Thwart ARP Spoofing

ARP spoofing necessitates deployment of robust cyber defense techniques. Mainly, one can employ network surveillance software and threat detection mechanisms. Both tools hold unique characteristics and functions, but when paired, efficiently manage ARP spoofing issues.

Network Traffic Analysis Software

These systems continuously scan network activities, alerting admins about anomalies or suspicious activities in real-time.

• Wireshark: This cost-free, open-source software excels in analyzing network traffic in-depth. It identifies ARP spoofing risks by inspecting ARP messages to uncover duplicate IP addresses.
• SolarWinds Network Performance Monitor: As a comprehensive network surveillance tool, SolarWinds generates sophisticated alerts for unusual activities. It detects ARP spoofing by highlighting abnormal changes in network traffic, instantly alerting network administrators.

Threat Detection Systems (IDS)

Threat detection systems (IDS) specialize in spotting network threats, particularly ARP spoofing. These systems scrutinize network information, watch for danger signals, and respond by notifying an admin or halting the threatening operation.

• Snort: This no-cost tool serves as an IDS and a security shield. Through its unique rule-based syntax, it checks incoming network traffic to effectively manage ARP spoofing risks. Depending on Snort's configuration, it can issue alerts, stop ARP spoofing attempts instantly, or perform both functions.
• Suricata: As a freely available and effective IPS tool, Suricata employs a strong engine to investigate network traffic oddities. It consistently detects diverse threats, including the indicators of ARP spoofing.

Specific ARP Spoofing Defense Software

Certain applications are designed specifically to tackle ARP spoofing events. These tools monitor ARP cache changes and trigger an early alert for any suspicious modifications.

• XArp: An ARP spoofing-centric tool, XArp incorporates features like active and passive scanning with advanced statistical techniques to detect ARP spoofing infiltrations.
• Arpwatch: This tool records ethernet/IP address pairs and checks ethernet traffic. It interprets any modifications as potential ARP spoofing attempts.

Tool Analysis

Selecting an ideal tool depends on the specific requirements and resources of your network. Diligent monitoring combined with immediate actions in case of alerts is crucial for reducing ARP Spoofing threats.

Examination of Key Instances: Sector 500 Corporation

Primarily focusing on Corporation 500, previously a victim of an intricate ARP Spoofing scheme. The malignant party planned to scrutinize and tamper with the corporation's classified information. However, powerful measures within the corporation's security apparatus outfought the infiltration attempt.

Corporation 500 had a network-based detection mechanism for intruders, designed for anomaly identification in ARP exchanges. This mechanism picked up on a peculiar surge of ARP solicitations emerging from a solitary IP. Consequently, an alert was raised. Swiftly, Corporation 500's cybersecurity unit sequestered the dubious IP, inaugurating a comprehensive probe.

The inspection led to the revelation that the IP in question was linked to equipment not catalogued in their system - a clear signature of an ARP Spoofing plight. Immediately, the unauthorised IP was disabled, and a system-wide security examination launched to make certain no additional equipment was compromised.

Close Look at Incident: Educational Institution

Next in line is a noteworthy educational institution that effectively impeded an ARP Spoofing scheme. The significant treasure trove of scholarly study and individual data made the institution's setup a coveted target.

The institution had activated a mechanism known as Dynamic ARP Check (DAC) on their routing devices. This mechanism vets ARP data packets within the network, disposing of those possessing unverified IP-to-MAC binding. An attempt at doctoring the ARP record flagged the DAC mechanism, blocking any nefarious data packets from scattering across the network.

The educational institution's tech crew was notified about the ensuing assault. The root cause was traced back to a compromised system internally, which was then isolated and depurated, bringing the infiltration to a halt.

Dissection of Episode: E-Commercial Entity

Finally, we look closely at an E-commerce organization, christened as Commerce Corp, which effectively defended its digital fortress against an ARP Spoofing infringement. The nefarious actor targeted the organization's commercial transfers intending to pilfer clientele credit card data.

Commerce Corp had a security protocol referred to as ARP Infiltration Alert (AIA), which scrutinizes the system for ARP reciprocations not initiated by a corresponding ARP request. This protocol is a crucial indicator of an ARP Spoofing breach.

When unrequested ARP responses were flagged by the AIA routine, an alarm was activated. The Commerce Corp's cybersecurity squad was able to promptly pinpoint the onset of breach and isolate the compromised network division. Following this, they set in motion a security check to reaffirm the reliability of their digital infrastructure and customer data safety.

Cutting-edge Tactics to Counter Crafty ARP Spoofing

A serious concern within the cybersecurity landscape, ARP Spoofing or ARP Poisoning, employs contentious methods. It involves a malevolent actor within a local digital network creating and transmitting deceptive ARP (Address Resolution Protocol) messages. This ill-intentioned manoeuvre enables the actor to masquerade their MAC address, impersonating a valid device or even the server's IP address, thus obtruding, manipulating, or hijacking data communication.

Perpetrators are consistently evolving. They enhance and polish their suite of tactics in MARP Spoofing attacks, harmonizing them with technological progress, consequently augmenting complexity, thus, increasing detection and halting difficulty.

Strengthening Protective Measures Against Evolved ARP Spoofing

A stand against advanced ARP Spoofing tactics mandates more than conventional defence mechanisms. Here's how you can bolster your shields:

1. Relentless Network Monitoring and Examination: Continuous check-ups and reviews of your network foundation can reveal abnormal actions indicative of an ARP Spoofing breach. This evaluation necessitates scrupulous oversight of ARP records and data transmission standards.
2. Application of Secure Interaction Protocols: Integrating secure interaction protocols like HTTPS, SSH, which utilize the principle of data encryption, constructs a formidable barrier against ARP Spoofing. Regardless of whether data is captured, its encrypted form creates an impasse for the assailant.
3. Leveraging Dynamic ARP Inspection (DAI): A native security measure, DAI confirms ARP packets within the framework, crushing ARP spoofing threats by discarding insincere ARP packets.
4. Execution of IP-MAC Linking Policies: Implementing stringent rules to link an IP address to a unique MAC address prevents adversaries from associating their MAC address with your IP.

Utilizing Wallarm AASM: A Calculated Defense against Escalating Network Risks

Despite the discussed preventatives, which provide some protection, they may be inadequate against ever-growing threats. In this context, Wallarm's API Attack Surface Management (AASM) serves as an exceptional strategy to tackle this concern.

Formulated especially for API settings, Wallarm AASM operates autonomously, without the need for intermediaries. It excels at unveiling external hosts and their respective APIs, identifies absent WAF/WAAP solutions, reveals hidden weaknesses, and eliminates API Leaks.

Opting for Wallarm AASM guarantees a thorough understanding of your API surroundings and pinpoints potential weak spots. This advanced instrument marks a substantial advancement in managing threats like ARP Spoofing.

Get off the mark by clicking the below link: https://www.wallarm.com/product/aasm-sign-up?internal_utm_source=whats, and enjoy a gratis Wallarm AASM trial.

While network threats shift forms, maintaining nimble security methodologies and adopting top-of-the-line solutions like Wallarm AASM enhances your capability to shield your network and data from ARP Spoofing and equivalent threats. Equipped with superior defence technologies, navigating through unexpected situations with indestructible assurance becomes feasible.

FAQ

1. What is ARP spoofing in cybersecurity and how does it work?

ARP spoofing, also known as address resolution protocol spoofing, is a type of cyber attack where an attacker sends falsified ARP messages over a local network. The goal is to associate the attacker’s MAC address with the IP address of another device, typically the gateway. This allows the attacker to intercept, modify, or block traffic between two legitimate parties. In the context of ARP spoofing in cyber security, it's a classic example of a man-in-the-middle attack that targets local networks.

2. What is ARP poisoning and how is it related to ARP spoofing?

ARP poisoning, sometimes referred to as ARP poison attack, is essentially the result of a successful ARP spoofing attempt. Once the attacker tricks devices into accepting false ARP responses, the network’s ARP cache becomes “poisoned,” leading to traffic redirection. The ARP poisoning meaning is closely tied to deception and traffic manipulation, which can lead to data theft, session hijacking, or denial-of-service. ARP poisoning cybersecurity risks are particularly serious in unprotected or flat networks.

3. How can ARP spoofing and poisoning be detected in a network?

ARP spoofing detection involves monitoring the network for unusual ARP activity, such as multiple IP addresses being mapped to a single MAC address. Tools like Wireshark, XArp, and IDS/IPS systems can alert administrators to ARP spoofing attacks in progress. Recognizing fake ARP responses and changes in normal ARP behavior is essential to spotting an ARP attack early, especially when ARP sniffing is being used to capture data silently.

4. What are the best methods to prevent ARP spoofing and ARP poisoning?

Preventing ARP spoofing starts with enforcing static ARP entries where possible and segmenting the network to minimize the attack surface. Implementing packet filtering rules and enabling dynamic ARP inspection on managed switches are effective countermeasures. For complete ARP poisoning prevention, organizations must use encrypted communication protocols like HTTPS, deploy intrusion detection systems, and ensure endpoint protection. Knowing how to prevent ARP spoofing is critical to any network defense strategy.

5. What is arpspoof and how is it used in ARP spoofing attacks?

Arpspoof is a command-line tool used to launch ARP spoofing attacks by sending fake ARP replies to a target system, effectively redirecting traffic through the attacker’s machine. When someone asks “what is arpspoof,” they are referring to one of the most commonly used utilities for exploiting ARP vulnerabilities in penetration testing or cyberattacks. It plays a key role in demonstrating how vulnerable a network can be to ARP-based threats if not properly secured.

6. Why are ARP spoofing attacks still relevant in modern cybersecurity?

Despite advances in security, ARP spoofing attacks remain effective because ARP is a fundamental protocol without built-in authentication. Many local networks still rely on default ARP behavior, making them susceptible to spoofing. In environments lacking proper segmentation or monitoring, attackers can use ARP spoofing to quietly eavesdrop or inject malicious traffic. The persistence of ARP spoofing and attacks highlights the need for modern defenses like endpoint visibility, threat detection, and encryption even on internal networks.